When I filmed Jared Taylor (leader & founder of American Renaissance), late
last Thursday I asked him if would be okay to film his speech, he said
"Yes, of course." Now I find this email in my mail box, this morning,
marked "URGENT REQUEST FROM JARED TAYLOR"
* * * * *
Jared has asked me if you could leave out the Q and A session on your You Tube
posting, (or alternatively leave out the interchange between him and Webster).
He'd be very grateful if you could do that in confidence.
Martin Webster's question dealt explicitly with the Jewish nature of the
demographic and cultural phenomena of White decline. While I don't approve of
Webster's sodomitic lifestyle or of his views regarding homosexuality, he was
the only one there who publicly asked a question explicitly dealing with
the Jewish aspects of multiculturalism & political correctness in general.
I repeatedly tried to ask such a question myself, but was
continuously passed over by the host-presenter Adrian Davies even though I
was clearly in the front row filming it all.
Martin Webster's question starts at 0:51:50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNQuicZTwxI
Also the host-presenter Adrian Davies demanded that we censor the part where
Jared Taylor makes a small tangential reference to the Northwest Front in Idaho.
So far I haven't censored any of it, but since you are on record as
stating that people like Martin Webster should be totally removed
from the political process for their depraved lifestyles, I was just
wondering what you have to say about it.
not Martin Webster’s brain I have a problem with, which is first-class. It’s
what he does with other parts of his anatomy which in my personal opinion—a
minority one these days—puts him beyond the pale. – HAC]
According to your value system how ought one respond when one is
put under pressure by a White Civil Rights activist (who is also an arch
Jew appeaser), to censor an anti-Jewish homosexual on the subject
of The Jewish Question?
* * * * * *
Jez: "Can you cut the Martin Webster question and
answer bit from the speech on You Tube as a special favour to Jared
Taylor? I know it’s going to cause more work for you, but he's concerned
its going to cause him untold problems and we do want him to come again!
Chris: "What sort of "untold problems?"
What it appears he is asking me to do is to retrospectively self-censor
my own work in order to avoid incurring potentially hostile Jewish
intransigence. That requires a good reason. You need to ask him what the exact
reason is before I can even consider going ahead with this type of odd and
Jez: "Better to cut the MW Q
and A bit, otherwise he'll probably just tell
YouTube to take the whole speech off, and that would be a shame. Don't shoot
the messenger. :-)"
Jez: "Chris, just please do what Jared wants.
"While I am a little surprised by the request, it ought in my view to be
honoured: I have to say that I personally dislike being filmed, period, as our American cousins say. I prefer to speak under
Chatham House rules. If that is not acceptable, I tend to be more guarded in
what I say than is desirable for the fullest possible exchange of views.
Evidently, Jared feels even more strongly than I do and his wishes as the guest
speaker ought in my opinion to be carried into effect, even if it annoys
Martin, which would be regrettable.
Jez: "Just [delete] the entire Q and A session and be
done with it. If you don't, then you've let me and the rest of the guys
down. The speaker's wishes are paramount. That's all there is to
"Dear Jez, Adrian & Jared:
regret to inform you all that I will not be censoring my video as requested for
the following stated reasons.
1. Having already spent many days painstakingly
attempting to successfully edit and upload the video on your behalf and in
light of the rather vague and unsubstantial reasons given for doing so, I am
afraid that I just don’t have either the time or the inclination to re-edit and
re-upload the video all over again.
both you and the rest of the general public have my full permission to copy and
to re-edit the material in question free of charge should you wish to produce
and promote an edited copy yourselves on your own websites, YouTube accounts
and blog pages etc.
2. I explicitly asked both Jared Taylor and Adrian
Davies for permission to film the speech prior to the speech itself. Not only
did I receive this permission but no condition of any kind was ever laid down
to the effect of prohibiting me from shooting and uploading the parts under
objection until now.
there was no condition except for the condition of having to refrain from
actively filming audience members, a condition which I duly complied with.
Adrian Davies was not filmed as an audience member. He
was filmed as the host-presenter facing/addressing the audience and at no time
was I ever stopped from filming, despite being situated in the front row
directly facing both Adrian Davies and Jared Taylor throughout the entire
length of the proceedings. I do not assume any
responsibility whatsoever for the apparent failure to stipulate adequately
clear conditions for filming prior to the event.
know that I have in the past been prepared to retrospectively censor at least
one recorded speech which at the time I was granted unconditional permission to
film by the speaker which the speaker then later abruptly rescinded via email,
but this really just takes the biscuit. Jared
Taylor is meant to be a professional political activist not a theatre director.
3. As far as I am concerned nothing in the video is
illegal in either the United Kingdom
or the United States.
4. I don’t think that the answer which Jared Taylor gave
in response to Martin Webster’s question in any way contradicted any of his
previously stated public positions with regards to Jews, Jewry, Judaism and/or the role of Jews in the creation
and/or permutation of Marxism, neo-Conservatism, neo-Liberalism and subsequent
political ideologies and doctrines. I have
requested more information about Jared Taylor’s reasoning for wanting me to
censor my video through Jez, but it now appears that this request has been
5. I am not prepared to compromise my moral and
political integrity or to tarnish my personal reputation within the White
Nationalist community by engaging in to what appears to be a baseless
appeasement through self-censorship program for the unearned protection of
other people's publishing assets from organized Jewish pressure. I'm sorry but
this just isn’t how I personally do journalism.
A politician who voluntarily founds and then leads a White civil rights
movement in cultural Marxist America should be prepared to be placed under a
certain amount of political and financial pressure, regardless of the personal
consequences either to himself or to his income.
understand that to do what you're asking of me would not only constitute as a
gross moral repugnancy on my part, but would also threaten my integrity as a
journalist, as a writer and as a political dissident.
With the extreme exception of some extraordinary situation, I could
never in my own right state of mind comply with such an unusual, unprecedented,
apparently spurious, controversial and possibly illicit request to self-censor. For the reasons given above I will not comply with
Jared Taylor’s request to censor my own footage.
of the footage I have thus far uploaded to YouTube from these meetings is my
own intellectual property and any false copyright claims WILL BE counter